Judge Vincent Dinalfo

I considered Judge Dinolfo, Just as guilty, if not more so than the original conspirators. The reason being, the original group never expected their treachery to be exposed. Judge Dinolfo, who replaced Judge Marks, was well aware of above conspiracy, of which I was the victim.

 

  1. After attorney Murante, was pressured, not to complete my CPL440.10 (addressed under heading, “David Murante”) I filed a motion to compel him to do so. My justification, he had already been paid half his fee, Judge Dinolfo, denied that motion, THIS EVEN THOUGH THE COURT NEVER GRANTED HIM PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW. 
  2. I then proceeded to file the CPL 440.10 motion on my own, Exposing the record number of Errors, Murante, had previously pointed out. Again, motion denied.
  3. I was later made aware of CPL 310.30, addressing jury notes, and Judge Marks, failing to recall the jury, and myself to the court room. Upon receipt of a same I filed a motion for the legally required reversal of my conviction. Again, Judge Dinolfo declined this even though that jury note had “disappeared”.
  4. After I once again requested copy of that Jury note, Judge Dinolfo court clerk, in its place sent me a copy of the court reporter’s timeline. It did confirm the court’s receipt of that jury note. However, it also revealed that it was not the “First” Note as stated to the attorneys by Judge Marks. For the timeline revealed the actual First Jury note, requested the exhibits complied with but not just disappeared but concealed from defendant, counsel, transcript and court record. 
  5. Upon researching the above I came upon a prior case, PEOPLE V KAHALEY, 105 AD3D 1322, in which Judge Marks had previously been reversed for making many of the same errors. But yet far less than she made in my case. regardless, People V Kahaley, out of over 600 Cpl 310.30 cases, in its 40 year history, listed in western law, as the single most relevant case. (After the establishing case, O’Rama)
  6. Unbelievably, even though the law clearly states, there can be no exceptions, Judge Dinolfo again denies my motion. He would also decline a motion for a reconstruction hearing – addressing the relevant deliberations proceedings. He would continue to do so with other related motions. And yet still even more evidence would disappear. In March of 2017, a 2nd parole board reversed the decision of the prior months that had granted me parole. Their reason that I had wrote a letter detailing the reasons I wanted my Ex-wife murdered. After parole failed to provide me with a copy of that alleged letter, I wrote to Judge Dinolfo, requesting a copy of same letter. I failed to receive a response, as did two attorneys.
  7. Then to multiply the illegalities multifold, each of the Appellate Courts, rather than reverse my conviction as required by their own case laws, instead, covered for the courts below.
  8. According to the U.S Supreme Court, in WILLIAMS V PENSYLVANIA, a multi member court must not have its guarantee of impartial justice undermined. For just the appearance of BIAS Demeans the reputation and integrity of not just one jurist, but the larger institute of which he or she is a part of – which begs the question what exactly does the title, Honorable mean? 
  9. If it was not for Judge Dinolfo’s reprehensible conduct, in all probability, I would have been exonerated years ago. Instead I have spent most of my final years in state prison.
  10. In other words, Judge Dinolfo has brought shame on all members of Monroe County Court.